India’s Chinese investment reset: India’s difficult experience with the United States is forcing a broader rethink of economic alignment. One sign came this week, when the Union Cabinet chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi eased restrictions on investments from countries that share land borders with India, including China. Non-controlling investments below 10% can now come through the automatic route in specified cases, while proposals that still require clearance are to move through a tighter approval timeline.
That is a significant shift. Since 2020, New Delhi had enforced a hard line on Chinese capital under what came to be known as Press Note 3. Now it is making room, cautiously, for Chinese money in areas where technology, scale and supply-chain integration matter.
READ | China’s 15th Five-Year Plan bets on tech-led global power
Press Note 3 and the costs of strategic signalling
Press Note 3 was introduced in April 2020, in the first phase of the pandemic and against the backdrop of rising India-China tensions after Galwan. Formally, the policy was meant to prevent opportunistic takeovers of stressed Indian firms by investors from neighbouring countries. In law, it applied to all countries sharing land borders with India, though in practice it became a China-centred instrument. It erected a broad approval regime that made investment slow, uncertain and often prohibitively delayed.
Proposals could take months, sometimes more than a year. Venture capital funds with Chinese limited partners were trapped in regulatory ambiguity. The effect was not merely to screen capital. It also cut off one route through which India had stayed connected to global manufacturing and technology networks.
That mattered because Chinese investors had become important players in India’s startup ecosystem, backing firms in e-commerce, fintech and consumer technology. More important, China sits at the centre of global manufacturing supply chains in electronics, solar equipment and industrial intermediates. Restricting Chinese investment did not reduce China’s role in those value chains. It merely made India harder to access from within them.
READ | Record trade surplus masks weakness of China’s economy
Manufacturing ambitions still run through China
Over the past few years, New Delhi appears to have absorbed a harder lesson. India’s ambitions in electronics, solar manufacturing, electric vehicles and advanced components cannot be realised by policy slogans alone. They require integration with production networks that still run, to a large extent, through China.
“China plus one” never meant China minus one. Even as companies diversify, they continue to depend on Chinese equipment, components, process know-how and capital. India’s own effort to build domestic capability has exposed its dependence in electronic components, capital goods, batteries, rare-earth magnets and clean-energy manufacturing. The latest policy change acknowledges that reality without saying so directly. Current reporting suggests the limited reopening is aimed precisely at such manufacturing-linked sectors.
This is not a full reopening. Sensitive sectors will remain under scrutiny. Oversight also survives through beneficial ownership rules linked to the Prevention of Money Laundering framework. The significance of the move lies elsewhere: India is reopening a narrow channel where it sees economic value and manageable strategic risk, not abandoning caution.
Why the recalibration came now
The shift is easier to understand when placed against India’s own industrial constraints. Delayed proposals, shallow domestic manufacturing depth, funding bottlenecks in startups and deep-tech, and persistent dependence on imported intermediates have all raised the cost of a blanket restriction. Chinese FDI into India had fallen to a negligible level, reported at just $2.67 million in the last fiscal year. That figure underlines the point. This is not a floodgate opening. It is a limited correction after a near closure.
The timing is not accidental. India’s engagement with the United States is increasingly shaped by transaction, not trust.
READ | India-China trade: Structural imbalance, not a one-year problem
Washington may see India as a strategic partner in balancing China in the Indo-Pacific, but its economic policy is still driven by domestic industrial priorities. Trade friction has persisted despite repeated declarations of strategic convergence. Tariffs remain a threat. Market access demands continue. The pressure on India to curb purchases of Russian crude shows the same pattern: US interests first, Indian constraints later.
That logic was articulated with unusual clarity in New Delhi itself. At the Raisina Dialogue on March 5, US deputy secretary of state Christopher Landau said Washington would not repeat with India what it saw as the mistake it made with China two decades ago by helping create a future commercial rival. The statement cut through the diplomatic niceties. The US may back India as a geopolitical counterweight, but it has no intention of underwriting India’s rise as a manufacturing challenger.
Keeping India’s options open
That leaves India with a more sober view of external partnerships. The US can be strategically useful and economically restrictive at the same time. China can be strategically hostile and economically relevant at the same time. Policy has to work within that contradiction.
American and European firms once invested heavily in Chinese manufacturing, transferred technology and used China as a base for exports. India wants to build a comparable manufacturing ecosystem, but it cannot do so by assuming that strategic partners will make room for it out of goodwill. Nor can it ignore the scale of Chinese capital and industrial capability.
China is not a dependable partner. But it remains one of the world’s deepest reservoirs of manufacturing finance, production capacity and technical capability. If India wants to expand its industrial base, it cannot afford the luxury of ideological consistency. It has to keep its economic options open.