Workplace mental health crisis: On an ordinary weekday morning in Bengaluru, Mumbai, or Gurugram, millions of employees log in, switch on their cameras, and slip into professional composure. Emails begin with courteous pleasantries. Meetings run back-to-back. What remains invisible is the exhaustion many carry into their workday—chronic stress, emotional fatigue, and quiet burnout that rarely find space in performance dashboards.
Mental well-being at work is no longer a peripheral concern or an HR add-on. It is now a central question of productivity, ethics, and leadership. Yet India’s corporate response remains trapped in a narrow frame that treats distress as an individual problem rather than a systemic failure of workplace design.
READ | Distress migration: Anti-trafficking policy must focus on mental health
When wellness becomes a performance metric
Over the past decade, corporate India has embraced the language of mental health. Wellness apps, yoga sessions, mindfulness webinars, and helplines are now commonplace. But this surface-level engagement has masked a deeper issue: stress has been individualised, even as its causes remain organisational.
Academic research has long established the link between workplace stress and physical illness. A study published in the Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine shows that poor mental health at work significantly raises the risk of hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. More recent research points to similar outcomes such as lower job satisfaction, impaired performance, and higher burnout risk when stressors are unmanaged.
The core problem is what psychologists describe as psychocentrism: the tendency to frame burnout as a personal weakness rather than a product of workload intensity, managerial behaviour, or institutional pressure. Employees are told to “build resilience” or “manage stress better,” while organisations rarely ask why burnout has become routine.
A 2024 survey by the Mpower Foundation found that over 90% of mental health concerns reported in Indian corporate settings were linked directly to workplace stressors, not individual coping deficits. No amount of meditation can compensate for unrealistic deadlines, unclear expectations, or chronically understaffed teams.
READ | India must put mental health at the core of development
Long hours, low sensitivity
This disconnect is not confined to the private sector. A recent administrative notification to educational institutions, instructing faculty to function between 8 am and 8 pm to “optimally utilise resources,” triggered widespread concern. Teachers were advised to adopt a “positive mindset” toward 12-hour workdays, even as basic infrastructure and safety concerns were left unaddressed.
The episode captured a broader institutional attitude: endurance is valorised, questioning is discouraged, and exhaustion is reframed as commitment. What employees need is not resilience training, but workplaces they do not need to recover from.
The World Health Organisation’s World Mental Health Report identifies workplaces as a critical site for preventive action, precisely because organisational structures, not individual frailty, drive most stress-related harm.
What the data says about India’s workforce
The numbers underline the scale of the problem. According to the Gallup State of the Global Workplace 2024 report, only 14% of Indian employees describe themselves as “thriving” at work. The remaining 86% report struggling or suffering, one of the weakest outcomes globally.
A 2025 study by Genius Consultants found that nearly four in five Indian employees expect their organisations to take responsibility for mental well-being. Yet behaviour has not caught up with expectation. A Naukri.com survey revealed that almost 75% of professionals hesitate to take leave for mental health reasons, fearing stigma or career penalties.
These are not indicators of individual fragility. They are symptoms of long-standing organisational neglect.
READ | Mental health crisis risks India’s growth story
Ethics, empathy, and the moral cost of burnout
Workplace ethics in India has traditionally focused on compliance. That framework is no longer sufficient. When emotional distress becomes widespread, compassion shifts from being a personal virtue to an institutional responsibility.
Research by Sattva Consulting shows that more than 80% of India’s white-collar workforce has experienced at least one mental health symptom, with nearly half reporting multiple indicators of distress. At that scale, burnout ceases to be a health issue alone; it becomes a moral failure of leadership.
The WHO has consistently flagged excessive workloads, low employee autonomy, and toxic hierarchies as key risk factors for mental distress. Burnout, then, is not the price of ambition. It is the cost of poorly designed systems.
A workforce that is voting with its feet
India’s younger workforce is forcing a recalibration. For Gen Z and millennials, mental well-being is no longer negotiable. The Deloitte 2025 Gen Z and Millennial Survey shows that nearly 70% of young Indian professionals evaluate employers based on mental health policies and inclusivity.
An NDTV survey found that poor work–life balance is the single biggest mental health trigger for Gen Z employees in India. These workers are not demanding indulgence. They are asking for predictability, respect, and psychological safety.
When talent begins to choose belonging over burnout, leadership metrics based solely on output and hours logged start to look obsolete.
From resilience to structural reform
Corporate narratives often celebrate resilience—the ability to endure pressure and “bounce back.” But resilience without reform becomes exploitation. Systems that rely on constant coping inevitably erode trust and productivity.
Structural reform begins with uncomfortable questions. Are workloads aligned with human limits? Are managers trained to recognise mental distress as part of their leadership role? Are performance reviews designed to reward psychological safety alongside results?
The economic case is equally compelling. The WHO estimates that poor mental health costs the global economy nearly $1 trillion annually in lost productivity. Deloitte projects that India alone could lose up to $1 trillion by 2030 if workplace mental health continues to be ignored.
Humane systems do more than retain talent. They enable sustained performance.
Redesigning work with purpose
Reimagining workplace ethics in India requires moving beyond slogans toward institutional redesign. That means setting realistic workloads, building feedback cultures anchored in growth rather than fear, and evaluating leadership not just by outcomes but by how teams experience work.
Psychological safety is no longer optional. It is a prerequisite for innovation, retention, and trust.
The future of work in India will not be shaped only by automation or artificial intelligence. It will be defined by whether organisations can recognise that every spreadsheet, target, and quarterly review is powered by a human mind, and many of those minds are exhausted.
Mental well-being is not an HR metric. It is the moral heartbeat of modern leadership. Organisations that understand this will not need to preach resilience. They will earn commitment by practising respect.
Pummy is a research scholar and Dr Salineeta Chaudhuri, Associate Professor, Economics at Christ University, Delhi-NCR
READ | Mental health distress: Decoding the impact of social media on Generation Z