Digital Competition Bill: Big Tech see red over ex-ante regulation

Digital Competition Bill, Big Tech
The draft Digital Competition Bill splits Big Tech - Google, Apple, Flipkart, Amazon, and Uber oppose pre-emptive regulation even as Twitter and Paytm extends support.

Large technology firms such as Google, Apple, Flipkart, Amazon, and Uber have opposed pre-emptive regulation proposed in the draft Digital Competition Bill to curb the dominance of a few companies in the digital space. The ministry of corporate affairs had solicited public feedback on an expert committee’s report and the draft bill. Twitter and Paytm are the only leading tech firms that extended support. The proposed ex-ante regulations seek to pre-emptively address potential abuse of dominance and monopolistic behaviour by large digital companies.

With more than 350 million users engaging in online transactions across various sectors such as e-commerce, travel, hospitality, and OTT platforms, India faces an urgent need for robust regulation. The country’s consumer-based digital economy is expected to reach a staggering $800 billion by 2030. Without stringent regulation in a rapidly expanding digital economy, large companies could use their scale and influence to hinder market entry of competitors.

READ | Global cryptocurrency boom: India’s regulatory dilemma continues

The proposed legislation has the potential to significantly impact consumers. A robust digital competition law can empower users by fostering greater choice and innovation. Increased competition among tech companies could lead to lower prices for consumers on e-commerce platforms, ride-hailing services, and streaming subscriptions. Additionally, the bill’s focus on openness could compel tech giants to make their platforms more interoperable, allowing users to easily transfer data and switch between services. This could empower consumers and prevent them from becoming locked into ecosystems controlled by a single dominant player.

The draft Digital Competition Bill

In recent years, Big Tech firms have come under increased scrutiny for anti-competitive practices and marginalising smaller entities. The proposed Digital Competition Bill seeks to establish a more equitable digital marketplace and ensure a level playing field for all entities. Companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon are already under global scrutiny for alleged abuse of market dominance through the extensive use of user data. Drawing inspiration from the EU’s Digital Markets Act, the proposed Bill introduces a dedicated section on openness, detailing the criteria for market dominance and identifying imbalances within the digital ecosystem.

In response to a recommendation from the parliamentary standing committee on finance, the ministry of corporate affairs formed a 16-member committee on digital competition law (CDCL) in February 2023 to draft the proposed legislation. Additionally, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has established a unit specifically to investigate antitrust practices by tech firms.

Minister of state for electronics and IT Rajeev Chandrasekhar has repeatedly stressed the importance of comprehensive cyber laws that are world-class, adaptable, and capable of addressing unforeseen disruptions. The Digital Competition Bill seeks to fortify India’s digital economy, projected to reach $1 trillion, by addressing these requirements and improving upon the current competition framework, which has not kept pace with technological advancements. A notable shift in the draft bill is the move from a reactive to a proactive regulatory approach, requiring companies to adopt measures to prevent anti-competitive practices before they occur.

Opposition to ex-ante regulations 

Beyond the evident reasons, tech giants have opposed stricter regulation, arguing that it could hamper innovation. Amazon, for example, has contended that pre-emptive regulation for the e-commerce sector might be premature and excessive, potentially leading to overregulation. Apple India has advocated for a light-touch regulatory approach that favors innovation over stringent controls. Similarly, Flipkart has stated that India’s existing regulatory framework is sufficient to regulate digital markets effectively. These companies have also criticised the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) for adopting a one-size-fits-all approach that may not be suitable for India’s unique market conditions.

The stronger regulations exemplified by the DMA and Digital Markets Unit primarily originate from developed countries. While the goal of fostering a fair and competitive digital marketplace is praiseworthy, there are concerns about the bill’s potential effects on a developing economy like India’s. Critics argue that strict regulations designed for more mature markets could stifle innovation within India’s burgeoning startup ecosystem, potentially impeding their growth and development.

Finding the right balance between fostering innovation and ensuring fair competition is crucial. The government can address the concerns of tech companies and startups by implementing a tiered regulatory approach. For instance, stricter regulations could be imposed on large companies with established dominance, while smaller players and startups could benefit from a lighter-touch regulatory framework. This would allow startups to flourish while reining in the potential anti-competitive practices of larger firms.

The challenge lies in balancing the need to regulate major tech companies to prevent anti-competitive practices without imposing overly complex regulations that could stifle the emergence of new startups. The government must strive to find a middle ground.

The Digital Competition Bill represents a critical juncture in the evolution of India’s digital economy. Striking a balance between fostering innovation and curbing potential abuses of power will be crucial. The legislation has the potential to empower consumers, incentivise fair competition, and propel India’s digital marketplace to even greater heights. As the world watches with keen interest, India’s success in regulating its digital economy will not only shape its own technological future but also serve as an example for other developing economies.