Budget 2026: Need ‘quality of solace’ proposals

There is a quiet truth about modern budgets that is rarely stated aloud: they are no longer instruments of allocation alone. They are also expected to be instrument of reassurance. Each Union Budget today is asked to calm anxieties that sit well beyond the balance sheet—about jobs that may not materialise, technologies that may displace, capital that may flee, institutions that may fail, and ecological debts that will one day be collected. 

Budget 2026 will be no exception. It will be judged not merely by fiscal arithmetic, but by whether it recognises the full spectre existing as the ecosystem variables.

READ | Budget 2026 must fix public health delivery gaps

The social dimension is the first shadow every budget must address, even when it pretends otherwise. India’s macro indicators may suggest resilience, but social fragility persists beneath them. Employment quality, not just employment quantity, has emerged as a defining concern. Household balance sheets remain vulnerable to shocks, while aspirations—fed by digital exposure and demographic pressure—are rising faster than incomes. A fiscally disciplined budget that ignores these stresses risks appearing competent but detached. Social spending is no longer charity; it is stabilisation. The challenge before the state is not whether to spend, but how precisely it can target support without entrenching dependency or distorting incentives.

That social compact is inseparable from political reality. Budgets are passed in Parliament, but implemented in a federation. State governments, local institutions, and sectoral interests shape outcomes long after the speech concludes. The political economy of reform now demands sequencing rather than shock. Structural changes—whether in subsidies, taxation, or welfare architecture—must be designed with institutional capacity and political durability in mind. A budget that advances reforms which cannot survive the next electoral cycle merely postpones adjustment and deepens cynicism. Political legitimacy today is earned through credible execution, not rhetorical boldness.

READ | Budget 2026: Fiscal policy debate ignores deepest structural flaws

Economic considerations, meanwhile, have become more complex rather than less. India remains one of the fastest-growing large economies, yet growth itself has become capital-intensive and unevenly distributed. Public investment has carried much of the recent expansion, placing greater responsibility on the exchequer to ensure that such spending crowds in, rather than crowds out, private investment. The fiscal dilemma is no longer growth versus prudence; it is composition versus credibility. A budget that protects productive capital expenditure while gradually rationalising revenue spending signals seriousness. One that obscures trade-offs behind optimistic projections invites market scepticism.

Capital—domestic and foreign—adds another layer to this calculus. India attracts investment not merely because of size, but because of predictability. Yet capital today is impatient, mobile and acutely sensitive to regulatory ambiguity. The state’s task is not to chase every inflow with incentives, but to anchor confidence through stable rules, transparent taxation and credible medium-term fiscal trajectories. Public capital must be deployed where it unlocks private participation, not where it substitutes for it. The budget must therefore be read as a signal to savers and investors alike: that India understands the difference between spending and investing.

Technology has transformed this signalling environment altogether. Digital public infrastructure, financial technology, artificial intelligence and platform-based markets have blurred traditional boundaries between public goods and private enterprise. The budget must recognise that technology is now both an enabler of inclusion and a vector of systemic risk. Funding innovation without investing in regulatory capacity would be a profound error. To be globally relevant, India would need higher public spends in AI and quantum computing than the outlay currently for these two sectors. 

Governance of data, algorithms and digital markets requires sustained institutional expenditure—often invisible, always indispensable. A statesmanlike budget would strengthen these capacities quietly, resisting the temptation to announce innovation without underwriting oversight.

Reputation and risk, once peripheral concerns, now sit at the centre of fiscal policy. Sovereign credibility is built not only through deficit numbers, but through consistency. Markets watch for consistency between stated intent and fiscal behaviour; citizens watch for fairness. Sudden policy reversals, opaque tax measures or ad hoc levies erode trust faster than they raise revenue. Budget 2026 must therefore prioritise clarity over cleverness. A clearly articulated path to fiscal consolidation, even if gradual, is more valuable than aggressive targets that cannot be met.

READ | The world India must budget for

Hovering over all these dimensions is the environmental constraint—a constraint that budgets have historically deferred. Climate transition is no longer a future agenda item; it is a present fiscal risk. Extreme weather events, energy transitions and global carbon regimes will increasingly shape public expenditure and revenue alike. Continuing to subsidise environmentally damaging pathways merely shifts costs forward. A prudent budget would begin internalising these realities—supporting cleaner technologies, financing resilience at the state level, and aligning industrial policy with long-term sustainability rather than short-term competitiveness.

Taken together, these forces form a spectre that no Union Budget can exorcise, only manage. Social expectations, political feasibility, economic discipline, capital confidence, technological governance, reputational credibility and environmental responsibility are no longer separable policy silos. They are intersecting pressures that demand coherence.

Budget 2026’s tests

The test for Budget 2026 is therefore not whether it satisfies every constituency, but whether it demonstrates an understanding of this complexity. Statesmanship in fiscal policy lies in making trade-offs explicit, institutions durable, and intentions credible. In doing so, the budget can reclaim its original purpose—not as an annual spectacle, but as a stable contract between the state and its future. This is the SPECTRE before every modern budget—Social, Political, Economic, Capital, Technology, Reputation and risk, Environmental—not a rhetorical device, but the hard perimeter within which credible governance must now operate.

READ | Budget 2026: Macro factors limits policy space for FM