Taxes are the lifeblood of government activity, financing welfare schemes, infrastructure, and the broader direction of the economy. India’s direct tax collections rose 9.2% year-on-year to ₹10.82 lakh crore in the first half of the fiscal year. At first glance, this signals fiscal strength. Yet a closer look shows that much of the increase comes not from booming economic activity but from a steep fall in refunds, which have declined by nearly a quarter. Gross collections, in contrast, have risen only modestly. The key question is whether India can truly celebrate this surge.
Refunds are integral to an accurate tax regime. When refunds are delayed or reduced, the government’s tax collections look stronger than it is. For taxpayers, however, slower refunds mean tighter liquidity, working capital stress, and reduced confidence in the system. The sharp decline in refunds may stem from stricter scrutiny, administrative backlogs, or tougher verification norms. While this inflates net collections in the short run, the effect could reverse once refund processing catches up.
READ | Decarbonising home cooling: Design first, finance next
Globally, tax administrations balance revenue mobilisation with taxpayer trust by emphasising efficiency and fairness. Countries like the UK and Australia issue refunds swiftly — often within weeks — thanks to automated verification systems. In the OECD, tax-to-GDP ratios are higher, but so is the perception of value received, as revenues finance strong social protection and public services. By contrast, India’s relatively low tax base and heavy reliance on a narrow pool of taxpayers underline the urgency of reform. International experience suggests that broadening the base, simplifying procedures, and ensuring prompt refunds are essential to sustaining compliance and trust.
Divergence between corporate and non-corporate taxpayers
A structural split is evident in the tax base. Corporates have driven revenue momentum, with higher advance tax payments reflecting resilient earnings. This underscores the profitability and steady compliance of large, formal enterprises. Strong securities transaction tax collections also highlight buoyant financial markets.
By contrast, non-corporate advance tax collections have weakened, pointing to stress among individuals, smaller firms, and unincorporated entities. This could reflect weaker income growth, shrinking savings, or greater caution in an uncertain economic environment. For policymakers, the divergence highlights the uneven nature of India’s recovery: large corporations and markets are thriving, but households and small businesses remain under strain.
Middle class and the double burden
The pressure on the middle class is particularly acute. A small fraction of Indians already bears the bulk of personal income tax collections, while also paying substantial indirect taxes through GST and other levies. Refund delays worsen the squeeze, since this group pays more upfront through advance tax or TDS and must wait longer for reimbursements. The perception that the middle class is overtaxed is thus reinforced, with consequences for consumption and sentiment.
India is in a phase of corporate resilience but household fragility. Strong corporate advance tax payments convey optimism in the formal sector, yet weaker non-corporate inflows and refund delays point to fragility in household finances. If the middle class curtails spending under tax pressure, domestic demand could weaken further. This would hurt discretionary sectors and slow overall growth. For the government, today’s buoyant receipts could turn into tomorrow’s headwinds.
Building a sustainable tax base
Revenue buoyancy must rest on broad-based income growth, not on corporates and suppressed refunds alone. Faster, transparent refund processing is essential to maintain taxpayer morale and reinforce trust in the Income Tax Department’s digitalisation efforts. A fair tax system is judged as much by its willingness to return excess payments as by its ability to collect.
The long-term path lies in widening the direct tax base, rationalising rates to reduce the middle-class burden, and simplifying compliance to minimise refund cycles. More accurate upfront payments would reduce the need for refunds and create a fairer system for both taxpayers and the exchequer.
With half the fiscal year remaining, policymakers are watching direct tax trends closely against budget targets. Sustained buoyancy will depend not just on corporate profits and compliance but also on household confidence and equitable sharing of the tax burden. India’s tax system must balance mobilisation with fairness. Only by easing the pressure on the middle class, ensuring prompt refunds, and broadening the base can India achieve both fiscal stability and economic vitality.