Railways remain the backbone of affordable, reliable, and inclusive transport worldwide. For a country as vast and unequal as India, creating a world-class rail network is not merely an infrastructure project—it is a development imperative. Indian Railways has set an ambitious target: 7,000 km of dedicated high-speed passenger corridors over the next two decades. This plan, coupled with the introduction of hydrogen-powered trains, marks a decisive step toward modernising India’s transport system.
The flagship Mumbai–Ahmedabad High-Speed Rail Corridor, covering 508 km, will be the first bullet train project, with partial operations expected in 2027 and full commissioning by 2029. Detailed project reports for five additional routes — Delhi–Varanasi, Delhi–Ahmedabad, Nagpur–Mumbai, Mumbai–Hyderabad, and Delhi–Amritsar — are already submitted, while the Chennai–Mysuru and Varanasi–Howrah corridors are in advanced planning.
READ | Madagascar protests signal a generational awakening
These projects seek not only to improve intercity travel but also to transform regional connectivity by 2047. In FY25, Indian Railways produced a record 1,681 locomotives — more than the combined output of Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Australia. With 24,000 trains running daily, capacity expansion is urgent. The ₹2.65 trillion capital outlay for FY26 highlights the scale of India’s modernisation drive.
Challenge to high-speed rail dream
While the ambition is undeniable, execution will test India’s administrative and financial capacity. Land acquisition remains the biggest hurdle. Fragmented rural ownership, litigation, and uneven compensation slow progress. Financing is equally demanding—high-speed rail requires large upfront investment, long payback periods, and convincing ridership forecasts.
Even with significant public capital, India will need private investors and innovative financing models—sovereign funds, long-term bonds, and viability gap funding—to meet the 7,000-km goal.
Governance complexity will also rise. Coordinating multi-state projects, managing resettlement, and enforcing environmental standards require sustained political consensus and administrative continuity. Without these, timelines will slip, as seen in previous infrastructure projects.
Balancing cost, capacity, and inclusion
India’s rail modernisation debate must also weigh ambition against affordability. Building 300–350 km/h bullet corridors is vastly more capital-intensive than upgrading existing routes to semi–high-speed standards of 160–200 km/h. Countries like Spain and China began with phased upgrades before investing in full high-speed systems. For India, where passenger volumes are large but income disparity is high, the question is not just engineering feasibility but economic viability. The success of the programme will depend on keeping fares within reach while ensuring that the system does not become an elite service at public expense.
Building high-speed corridors is not just about track engineering—it demands systemic upgrades in safety, signalling, and operations. Announcing corridors capable of 350 km/h is easier than maintaining them. Indian Railways must strengthen its automatic train protection systems such as Kavach 4.0 and 5.0, modernise control centres, and adopt predictive maintenance to ensure reliability.
Equally critical is workforce readiness. High-speed operations require specialist training, stringent safety culture, and responsive maintenance logistics. Indian Railways has excelled in scaling conventional networks, but high-speed travel allows zero margin for error.
A critical blind spot in the current strategy is the absence of a detailed operating model. High-speed lines are expensive to run, and farebox recovery rarely meets expectations unless complemented by non-fare revenue from station retail, real estate, and advertising. Japan’s Shinkansen and France’s TGV thrive on integrated urban hubs and timed feeder connections. Without seamless multimodal integration—metros, buses, and first-mile services—high-speed rail’s efficiency is lost the moment a passenger steps off the train. Indian Railways will need unified ticketing, smart transfers, and commercial development around stations to make the network financially sustainable and user-friendly.
Hydrogen trains: Promise and practicality
The proposal to introduce hydrogen-fuelled trains reflects India’s aspiration for clean mobility. But economic and technical feasibility remains uncertain. A CSTEP study on the Kalka–Shimla route found hydrogen train capital costs of ₹41–50 crore per unit versus ₹27 crore for diesel. Lifetime costs are somewhat comparable — ₹70–85 crore for hydrogen against ₹103 crore for diesel — but the hydrogen supply chain in India is still in its infancy.
Green hydrogen remains expensive, and supporting infrastructure—electrolysers, refuelling stations, and storage—demands major investment. Hydrogen trains may be viable for short routes and heritage segments, but not yet for high-speed intercity travel.
If India executes this programme effectively, it could evolve from a rail-technology importer to a global supplier. The next-generation Vande Bharat 4.0 trains, designed for export, point in that direction. Dedicated corridors built with indigenous design, signalling, and manufacturing could help India compete with Japan, China, and European firms in cost-effective, tropicalised rail solutions.
Achieving that position requires not just prototypes but reliable supply chains, internationally certified manufacturing, and consistent performance records. Export ambitions must be matched by long-term industrial policy, quality assurance, and after-sales service ecosystems.
Regional connectivity and strategic payoffs
Domestically, faster intercity links will shrink travel times and improve labour mobility. Internationally, enhanced networks could extend to neighbours—Bangladesh, Nepal, and Bhutan—anchoring India as a regional rail hub.
High-speed rail could deepen regional economic integration and enable cross-border passenger and freight movement, supporting broader South Asian value chains. Such connectivity carries both economic and diplomatic dividends.
The environmental dimension also deserves sharper focus. High-speed rail is a cleaner alternative to aviation, but its construction has a heavy carbon footprint—particularly in concrete viaducts and tunnels. A coherent green blueprint must accompany the build-out: renewable power procurement for traction, climate-resilient track design, and water-efficient maintenance depots. As India electrifies its entire rail network, integrating high-speed corridors into a renewable-heavy grid will be crucial for managing both cost and emissions. Building climate resilience into this massive investment will ensure it remains viable long after the excitement of inauguration fades.
The passenger at the centre
Ultimately, the success of India’s high-speed rail ambition will depend on how it transforms passenger experience. Modernisation is not just about engineering—it is about punctuality, cleanliness, comfort, and digital convenience. The Vande Bharat trains have already raised the bar for acceleration, amenities, and aesthetics. High-speed corridors must go further: seamless ticketing, real-time updates, and efficient last-mile links.
Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw has emphasised that modernisation is as much about the journey as the infrastructure. Only when passengers experience reliability and comfort from booking to arrival will high-speed rail become not just a symbol of progress, but a tangible improvement in daily life.
India’s high-speed and hydrogen rail ambitions are bold and necessary. But ambition must be anchored in governance reform, sustainable finance, and execution discipline. If done right, they could redefine mobility, catalyse industrial innovation, and place India among the world’s rail leaders—an outcome worthy of a nation on the move.