MSMEs face a growing squeeze on profitability: An increase in the price of paper or printing may appear insignificant to a customer. For a small business operating on narrow margins, however, even a modest rise in input costs can make the difference between earning a reasonable profit and barely covering expenses. Expecting such businesses to absorb successive cost increases without raising their prices ignores the economics of running a small enterprise.
Field research conducted at a local printing and photocopying shop illustrates the problem. The business operates three machines and is managed entirely by its owner, without employees. Monthly expenditure amounts to approximately ₹3,000–₹4,000 on paper, ₹5,000–₹6,000 on ink and toner, and ₹2,000 on electricity. Sales typically range between ₹30,000 and ₹40,000 a month, with business improving during examination periods.
READ | BRICS can help Indian MSMEs climb global value chains
A rise in toner prices increases the cost of every additional page printed. If the owner maintains existing charges, the profit earned on each page falls. Raising prices might protect margins, but could encourage customers to reduce their printing requirements or visit competing shops. The owner must therefore weigh the risk of losing business against the financial consequences of keeping prices unchanged.
MSME profit margins under pressure
The experience of this printing shop reflects a broader concern about profitability in India’s micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs). According to the SIDBI MSME Outlook Survey for January–March 2026, only 20% of manufacturing and trading enterprises and 19% of service enterprises reported an improvement in net profit margins. Between 19% and 28% reported a decline, although the majority experienced no material change.
The survey’s consolidated net response on profit margins slipped from a positive 3% in the preceding quarter to a negative 3%. This suggests growing pressure on profitability, although the survey also found that businesses expected conditions to improve over the following year.
The Economic Survey 2025–26 identifies raw materials, intermediate goods, energy, logistics and regulatory compliance as important determinants of industrial competitiveness. High input costs impose a particular burden on smaller manufacturers and downstream producers, whose limited margins leave less room to accommodate price increases. They also reduce the resources available for investment in better equipment and productivity improvements.
The problem is aggravated by the limited bargaining power of small enterprises. A neighbourhood printing shop rarely purchases enough paper or toner to negotiate the discounts available to larger buyers. Nor can it easily spread higher operating costs across a large customer base. Competition from nearby businesses further restricts its ability to raise prices.
The June 2026 assessment by Crisil Intelligence reinforces these concerns. It projected that revenue growth among Indian MSMEs would moderate to 7.5–8.5% in 2026–27, one percentage point lower than in the preceding financial year. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) margins were expected to decline by 50–100 basis points to 5–5.5%.
Crisil attributed the deterioration largely to energy-related disruptions and higher input costs associated with the West Asia conflict. Smaller enterprises were particularly exposed because of their limited ability to pass higher costs on to customers. The projections also underline the considerable differences between industries, depending on their reliance on energy, imported materials and export markets.
READ | AI adoption can lift MSME productivity, only if businesses can act on it
Why small businesses cannot simply raise prices
The ability to recover rising production costs depends partly on price elasticity of demand, which measures how strongly customers respond to changes in prices. Where buyers have several alternatives, even a relatively small increase may lead to a substantial reduction in demand.
For a local printing business, customers can compare rates among nearby shops. Some may print fewer documents or switch to digital copies. During examination periods, however, demand for certain printing and photocopying services may be less sensitive to price because students have immediate requirements.
This variation makes pricing decisions difficult. A business with relatively price-sensitive customers may lose enough sales after an increase to offset the additional revenue earned per transaction. Where demand is less sensitive, passing on a portion of the higher cost may be feasible. The extent of competition, customer loyalty and the urgency of a purchase all influence the outcome.
Keeping prices unchanged can help preserve sales, particularly when cost increases are temporary. But prolonged absorption of higher expenses gradually erodes profitability. For an owner-operated business, reduced profits can also mean less income available for household needs, equipment repairs and future investment.
Efficiency has limits
The printing shop has already adopted several measures to contain expenditure. Rough or misprinted paper is reused where appropriate, machines are switched off when idle, and equipment is maintained regularly to avoid unnecessary repairs and waste.
These practices lower operating costs and reduce resource consumption. They demonstrate how environmental sustainability can coincide with sound business economics. Yet the savings available from such measures are finite. Once avoidable waste has been reduced, further cuts may compromise service quality or the reliability of equipment.
More efficient machinery could lower electricity or toner consumption, but acquiring it requires capital. A shop whose margins have been compressed by rising operating expenses may find it difficult to finance precisely the investment that would improve its productivity.
The same constraint affects MSMEs in other sectors. Energy-efficient equipment, computerised inventory systems and better logistics can reduce recurring expenditure. Their adoption, however, depends on the expected savings being sufficient to justify the initial investment.
READ | Retail MSMEs need more than Udyam recognition
Lower input costs and affordable credit
The policy response should recognise these financial constraints. Governments can help smaller businesses by reducing avoidable costs arising from inefficient transport systems, unreliable electricity supply and burdensome regulatory procedures.
The Economic Survey’s proposal for a national input-cost reduction strategy is relevant here. It argues for identifying distortions that raise the cost of widely used industrial inputs, including tariff structures that penalise downstream producers. Addressing such distortions could improve competitiveness across a range of industries rather than providing relief to a few selected enterprises.
Access to affordable working capital is equally important. A business may remain profitable on paper yet struggle to meet operating expenses when payments from customers arrive after bills to suppliers have fallen due. Timely credit can prevent a temporary cash-flow shortage from forcing reductions in essential expenditure or postponement of necessary maintenance.
Credit, however, cannot compensate indefinitely for an unprofitable business model. Borrowing helps manage the timing of payments; it does not eliminate a persistent gap between production costs and selling prices. Small businesses therefore need to assess their pricing regularly, identify genuine opportunities to improve productivity and invest where the expected returns justify the expenditure.
For the printing shop, a combination of preventive maintenance, efficient machine use and modest price adjustments may prove more practical than attempting to absorb every increase in paper and toner costs.
Customers have a legitimate interest in affordable services, and competition remains an important discipline on businesses. But holding prices down at the expense of maintenance and investment can eventually undermine the quality and availability of those services.
A small business that absorbs higher costs earns less on each sale. If the squeeze continues, it has fewer resources to replace ageing machines or expand operations. The economic cost of persistently low margins extends beyond the owner’s immediate income. It also reduces the business’s capacity to improve productivity and remain competitive.
For India’s MSMEs, the policy priority should be to make essential inputs and finance more affordable while allowing businesses sufficient pricing flexibility to recover legitimate costs. A market in which small enterprises can cover their expenses but cannot accumulate enough capital to invest offers limited prospects for sustained growth.
Ruhani Sadana is an economics student, and Dr Parul Oberoi Assistant Professor, CHRIST University Delhi NCR Campus.