The threat of AI anxiety: Technological disruption is not new. What is new in the AI phase is the speed and volume of the surrounding narrative. Social media, corporate marketing, and a hyperactive news cycle have turned a familiar process of economic adjustment into a constant stream of urgency, fear, and insecurity.
Companies present AI products as indispensable. Training providers sell urgency. Headlines predict redundancy, automation, and the collapse of careers. Corporate hype and media panic now reinforce each other, and workers, students, and families absorb both.
Beneath that noise, the underlying fact is unchanged: technology has always reordered economies, and people have always adapted. The harder problem in this cycle is not AI alone, but the fear built around it.
READ I Can India power the artificial intelligence dream?
AI anxiety and the manufactured obsolescence narrative
The belief that one skill can guarantee lifetime employment has never been true. Industries rise and decline. Production shifts across borders. New sectors emerge while old ones shrink.
The automotive industry in the UK, France, and the US has contracted as manufacturing capacity moved to China, Korea, and India. Sectors that once shaped national identity — textiles, steel, electronics — have either relocated or been rebuilt in different forms.
Societies did not collapse. Workers adjusted, often painfully. Economies generated new work.
So why does AI feel different?
Because fear now travels faster than facts. Social media algorithms reward alarm. Influencers monetise doom. Firms use anxiety to sell courses, subscriptions, and tools. The message is blunt: learn this now or become irrelevant.
That is not neutral guidance. It is fear-based persuasion.
The underlying picture is less dramatic. Some coding roles may shrink. Other roles will expand across agricultural research, pharmaceuticals, clinical trials, medical technology, food science, and environmental systems. Human creativity does not vanish under technological change. It shifts to where new value is created.
READ I What hypnosis can teach us about artificial intelligence
Job transition, not job extinction
The world is not facing the end of work. It is facing a period of unstable transition.
That distinction matters. Automation can reduce repetitive tasks while increasing demand for work that depends on judgment, interpretation, trust, and coordination. The list is familiar but still under-valued: critical thinking, ethical reasoning, emotional intelligence, scientific inquiry, creativity, leadership, and cultural understanding.
These are not marginal skills. They sit at the centre of high-value work.
Consider agriculture. Farming now relies on drones, sensors, climate modelling, genetics, and engineering alongside agronomy. Pharmaceuticals and clinical research are expanding as populations age and medicine becomes more personalised. Food science is being pushed by nutrition demands, climate stress, and supply-chain volatility.
These sectors need technical competence. They also need human judgment, interdisciplinary thinking, and institutional trust.
READ I Artificial intelligence: TRAI urges collaborative efforts for responsible regulation
Mental health and the hidden cost of AI anxiety
The most immediate damage from rapid technological change may not be unemployment. It may be mental strain.
People are being asked to absorb constant comparison, unrealistic expectations, endless upskilling pressure, and a creeping sense that machine efficiency is replacing human worth. That is the real force behind today’s anxiety.
Young people feel it while choosing careers. Mid-career professionals feel it when occupational ladders move under them. Older workers feel it when interfaces and tools change faster than habits can. Parents feel it when they try to read the future through contradictory headlines.
The anxiety is global, private, and often unspoken.
It is also not inevitable.
Human worth has never been anchored to a single task. It rests on adaptability, resilience, social intelligence, and the capacity to learn. Those are precisely the capabilities societies have used in every previous transition.
Continuous learning without AI anxiety
Continuous learning is not a new demand. It is a permanent condition of economic life. What has changed is the speed of visible change.
Earlier industrial shifts often unfolded over years. Now every product release, funding round, and prediction is broadcast in real time. This creates the impression of collapse when the economy is often undergoing reallocation.
That distinction is important because panic produces bad decisions. People chase tools without understanding use cases. Institutions redesign training around hype cycles. Employers confuse software familiarity with real capability.
Continuous learning should be treated as an economic necessity, not a moral burden. It is how workers move across sectors, recombine skills, and find relevance in new systems.
A coder may move into research support. A marketer may move into analytics. A teacher may become a digital educator. A factory worker may become a technician. The path is rarely linear, but it is real.
Human potential is not fixed. Labour markets are difficult, but they are not static.
Technology mindset: reclaiming control from fear
A healthier response to technological change begins with a change in posture.
First, treat AI anxiety-based claims with suspicion. Headlines are incentives, not forecasts. Predictions are not destiny.
Second, build around transferable skills. Communication, problem-solving, ethics, leadership, and creativity retain value across tools and sectors.
Third, invest in interdisciplinary capability. The next wave of opportunity will come from combining domains: AI with medicine, data with sustainability, engineering with biology, technology with public systems.
Fourth, treat mental health as economic infrastructure. Workers cannot adapt under permanent panic.
Fifth, keep the hierarchy clear: technology is a tool. It can extend human capability, but it does not replace human purpose.
AI future and human agency
The world is entering a period of real possibility. AI can accelerate medical discovery, improve food systems, expand educational access, and help solve coordination problems that have long resisted policy and markets.
But those gains depend on how societies govern the transition — and how individuals interpret it.
The larger threat is not AI itself. It is the narrative that tells people they are already too late.
Human societies have survived more disruptive transitions than this. They will survive this one as well, not by denying change, but by meeting it with institutional sense, emotional steadiness, and practical adaptation.
The future will not belong to those who fear machines most. It will belong to people who learn how to use them without surrendering judgment.
Kumar Kuntikanamata is Councillor in Fleet Town council, Hampshire, UK. He is an expert in pharma industry and worked for many global firms. He has also worked as Vice Chairman for British South India Council of Commerce.