Expensive capital demands a new era of confidence: In an era when capital carries a steeper price and higher costs, the contraindication of reckless speed is finally clear. The world of cheap money, as we saw the previous 15 years – when bold bets could paper over risk – has receded. Today, ambition must bend to discipline. The moment demands not growth at all costs, but growth that can sustain. In recent years, many businesses accepted capital as a constant.
The imperative was expansion: acquire, diversify, inflate toplines. Underwriting promise was treated as nearly equivalent to delivering profit. That age is over. Borrowing now requires a rationale. Every rupee deployed must earn its keep. Companies cannot rely on narrative alone; they must anchor their ambitions in cash reality.
Globally, the flow of venture and private equity capital has become disciplined rather than broad. Providers demand credible proof points, risk limits, and sustainable economics. In India, by contrast, the banking system is flush with funds; liquidity is abundant, interest coverage robust, and many balance sheets have deleveraged. Yet private investment has lagged behind the surge in government capital expenditure. Why are corporates hesitating? So many are instead channeling capital into share buybacks or outward investments, seeking not only yield but tactical diversification beyond domestic headwinds. The paradox underscores a fundamental truth: liquidity is not the constraint—confidence is.
READ I Leadership training for politicians can strengthen democracy
Expensive capital and the end of easy growth
That choice is not purely financial; it is strategic and psychological. In an age of expensive capital, the perceived clarity and predictability of foreign markets may appear safer than domestic ventures beset by regulatory uncertainty, demand cyclicality, or policy shifts. Returns abroad become a hedge—not just an opportunity. But that is also a rebuke to domestic institutional ecosystem. If investing overseas is more attractive than investing at home, that signals policy, regulatory or structural distrust. It is a problem not for finance, but for governance.
Public capex, led by infrastructure, green energy, logistics and digitization, has carried much of the growth burden in recent years. It has laid valuable foundations. But state spending cannot substitute private risk-taking indefinitely. The baton must pass. To do so, the state must move from patron to partner: removing barriers, stabilizing rules, ensuring contract sanctity, rewarding performance, and creating credible incentives for long-latency bets.
Boards and management must adjust from expansion narrative to allocation logic. They should amplify capital allocation discipline, rigorously vet new ventures, and demand proof-of-concept before scaling. Incentives should reward durability, not just growth headlines. Executives need to think like capital stewards and developers of optionality, not merely generals of expansion.
Yet as this new backdrop takes shape, two additional headwinds loom. First, global geopolitical fault lines remain volatile. Trade tensions, tariff wars, sanctions regimes, supply-chain realignments, and the specter of conflict inject uncertainty into cross-border investment, commodity pricing and market access. Corporates contemplating local investments must weigh these risk premiums.
Even robust domestic opportunities may appear less attractive if the horizon is clouded by geopolitical tremors. In some cases, companies may rationalize capital flight or foreign diversification as strategic insurance, rather than solely yield chasing. In other words, the global geopolitics of the 2020s remain a drag on sentiment and capital commitment.
Second, the rise of artificial intelligence, automation, and other emergent technologies imposes deep challenges on both the nature of work and the architecture of skills. Corporates must invest in digital transformation to remain competitive, but doing so demands not just capital but patience, experimentation and a toleration for failure. At the same time, workforce transition must be managed. Technologies like generative AI and automated decision systems will displace legacy tasks even as they create new ones. The institutional bottleneck is not invention but human capability: who can build, calibrate, govern and scale these systems?
India’s demographic dividend can be a true advantage — if it is supported by an adaptive, high-agility skilling regime. But our educational system, vocational training apparatus and corporate reskilling mechanisms must become far more responsive. The risk is that emerging-technology adoption becomes a force of exclusion rather than inclusion. If firms invest in cutting-edge systems while large segments of the workforce are left behind, the political, social and operational costs will accumulate.
The real challenge for leadership is not only deploying AI and automation but doing so with a social contract in mind: providing pathways for displaced workers, modular retraining, hybrid human-machine models, and measures that insulate social stability.
Restoring investor confidence through policy trust
In this composite environment — expensive capital, geopolitics, technological upheaval—smart growth becomes an imperative, not a preference. Corporates must marshal capital with modular experiments, stage investments, prune ruthlessly, and refuse half-formed gambits. Boards should ingrain skepticism, demand adaptive learning, and enforce accountability. Executives should think in terms of optionality, scenario hedging and asymmetry of downside.
Policy frameworks must likewise evolve. Public support should not merely prop weak business models but catalyze resilient ones. Co-investment, milestone-linked instruments, programmatic funding and outcome guarantees can attract private capital while aligning it to public purpose. Regulatory stability, legal predictability, and forward-looking roadmaps will insulate projects from policy whiplash.
Perhaps most important is institutional credibility. In a world of signal scarcity, trust becomes a currency. Governments and regulators must produce consistency. Corporates must prove they can deliver—not through bold pledges, but through disciplined deliverables. Societies must value realism over hyperbole.
Over time, the companies that adapt will show their difference. Those built on slack may struggle. Those built to survive lean cycles will endure. That distinguishes the fleeting from the foundational. The narrowing of capital flows is not a contraction but a reallocation toward those who can perform under duress.
The choice before us is clear. We can cling to the myth of growth at all cost, hoping liquidity returns, risks fade and exuberance returns. Or we can accept that we live in a more exacting world—a world where growth must be deliberate, where capital must earn its keep, where ambition aligns with coherence, and where institutional trust is earned, not assumed.
If India can match its fiscal discipline with institutional trust and human capability, it can convert expensive capital into exceptional growth. Confidence, not capital alone, will define who leads the next decade
Confidence, in this context, is not a sentiment but an ecosystem condition — the connective tissue that allows capital, policy and enterprise to work in concert. It begins with policy confidence, built on stable frameworks, consistent regulation and the assurance that the rules will not shift midway. It extends to corporate confidence, reflected in a firm’s willingness to invest in the domestic economy rather than seek safer returns abroad.
It rests on investor confidence, sustained by the belief that governance is transparent and that capital will be treated fairly. And it depends ultimately on societal confidence, the quiet conviction among citizens that innovation, effort and integrity are rewarded. When these four layers align, capital finds purpose, reforms find traction and growth acquires legitimacy.
In an economy flush with capital but hungry for direction, we need growth that is not fast, but certifiable. Not expansive in promise, but resilient in delivery. Smart growth is the path forward.