Economic policy: India wants to become a developed country by 2047. A higher rank among the world’s largest economies will not deliver that status. The next stage will require harder economic reform, undertaken while trade barriers are rising, supply chains are being used as instruments of state power and artificial intelligence is altering the economics of work.
At a meeting with senior government secretaries on 28 July, Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for changes in administrative processes, work culture and institutional efficiency. The Finance Ministry’s latest Monthly Economic Review made the larger point: incremental policy adjustment will not give India strategic leverage in a more adversarial world. The distinction matters. Reform announcements can improve sentiment; only execution creates productive capacity.
READ | Creative economy can be India’s next growth engine
Economic policy after market primacy
Indian economic management has concentrated, with good reason, on containing inflation, enforcing fiscal discipline and attracting capital. These remain necessary. They are no longer sufficient because the global economy is not being organised by market efficiency alone.
Under Donald Trump, the United States has widened tariff protection and retained tight controls on advanced semiconductors and artificial-intelligence hardware supplied to China. Beijing has used its position in critical minerals, including rare earths, gallium and germanium, to impose export controls of its own. The European Union’s Green Deal Industrial Plan seeks to expand domestic clean-technology manufacturing. Asian governments are offering subsidies to secure factories that once would have been located largely on cost.
This is economic rivalry conducted through technology, trade and supply chains. India cannot treat each disruption as a temporary shock to be managed until normal commerce resumes. The old normal is receding.
READ | Informal economy: Why shadow work defies regulation
Indian economy has an opening, not an entitlement
The movement by multinational companies to diversify production away from China gives India an opening. Vietnam, Mexico and several other economies are pursuing the same investment. A large domestic market gets India considered; it does not secure the factory.
Long-term capital looks for predictable rules, reliable power, efficient logistics, timely approvals and an administration that can settle disputes without indefinite delay. Tax incentives and lower wages cannot compensate for uncertain implementation. Investors compare how governments function, not merely what they promise.
The Centre recognises the problem. Its difficulty lies in converting reform into routine administration. A clearance shortened on paper but delayed by a state agency, municipality or regulator is still a delayed clearance. India’s economic development will depend less on announcing another reform package than on making existing decisions work across ministries and levels of government.
AI changes India’s labour bargain
Artificial intelligence adds a different pressure. The International Labour Organisation estimates that one in four jobs worldwide has some exposure to generative AI, with transformation more likely than wholesale replacement. For India, even task-level automation matters. Its demographic dividend assumes that growth will create millions of jobs for workers moving out of agriculture and entering the labour force.
Cheap labour loses some of its attraction when machines can perform a larger share of routine cognitive work. India therefore needs more than labour-intensive assembly. It needs workers who can use new technology, firms that can absorb it and an education system that can adjust courses to the requirements of emerging industries. The Prime Minister’s call for industry-linked academic programmes addresses this gap, but universities and employers will have to build them.
READ | Real economy, hidden behind the numbers
India also has a technology-capacity problem. It has a large pool of software talent but remains dependent on imported advanced chips, computing infrastructure and foreign AI platforms. The country’s ambitions cannot stop at supplying services to technology developed elsewhere. Computing capacity, semiconductor production, data infrastructure, advanced manufacturing and research capability will determine how much value Indian firms retain and how much policy freedom the government possesses.
Economic development requires strategic capacity
The RBI has projected real GDP growth of 6.6% for 2026-27, a rate most large economies would welcome. India has also absorbed recent global shocks better than many emerging markets. Strong headline growth, however, cannot insure the economy against a prolonged rise in crude prices, a wider West Asian conflict or another round of trade and technology restrictions.
Higher oil prices would put pressure on inflation, the fiscal deficit and the current account. Weaker exports would affect manufacturing investment and employment. The Finance Ministry’s caution about softer high-frequency indicators is therefore useful, even when individual measures remain firm. GDP data describe the recent past; investment decisions depend on expectations about the next disruption.
Resilience must now mean the ability to produce critical goods, finance research, secure energy supplies and implement decisions quickly. A tariff order, chip restriction or oil-price spike can arrive in days. Factories, skills and administrative competence take years to build. India’s economic policy must close that mismatch.