India Afghanistan trade talks: Afghanistan has sent an unmistakable signal. Officials in Kabul have urged India to reopen trade channels, revive the air-freight corridor, and explore new land–sea routes. Reuters and Indian Express have reported these overtures with some surprise, because India has limited its engagement to humanitarian aid since August 2021.
The question is simple. Should India respond with enthusiasm, caution, or strategic patience? Afghanistan offers opportunity, but it also carries risk—political, security-related, and legal. India must therefore calibrate its response with care. A premature embrace may please Kabul, but it could place Delhi at odds with its own security concerns and with international sanctions regimes.
READ | South India’s growth model: What the North must learn now
India Afghanistan trade talks
Afghanistan’s economic distress is well documented. Recent Business Standard reporting shows Kabul pressing for the return of Indian exporters in food, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods. The Afghan government wants to revive the air corridor, the one reliable channel that bypassed Pakistan and sustained bilateral trade before 2021.
India’s engagement since the Taliban takeover has been cautious but not absent. Wheat, medicines, vaccines and relief supplies have gone to Afghanistan. A limited diplomatic presence was restored to coordinate aid. But Delhi has drawn a firm line: humanitarian yes, commercial no.
Yet Afghanistan remains important to India. It is the land bridge to Central Asia. It is a potential route for energy, transit and mineral corridors. It is also a buffer in a region where China and Pakistan are expanding influence. But the absence of a recognised government in Kabul, and the presence of international sanctions, complicate every decision. India must therefore ask: what can be done without violating law, norms, or prudence?
Economic dimensions of India-Afghanistan ties
There was a time when India’s exports to Afghanistan exceeded several hundred million dollars. Indian pharmaceuticals, food products, textiles and machinery had a strong market. Afghan exporters, especially in dry fruits and fresh produce, reached Indian buyers through the air corridor. All of this collapsed after 2021.
Can this be revived? In theory, yes. The economic logic remains sound. The Chabahar–Zaranj–Delaram route gives India an alternative to Pakistan. Afghanistan has mineral deposits—copper, iron ore, and possibly lithium—that attract global interest. Indian exporters would welcome a new market if payment and insurance risks are addressed.
But should theory override reality? Afghanistan remains under complex sanctions. Its banking system is impaired. Insurance premiums for travel and freight are prohibitive. The security situation is uncertain. A company entering Afghanistan risks reputational damage, payment default, and entanglement with entities under sanctions. Which Indian firm will expose itself to these risks without a credible guarantee? The list will be short.
Geopolitical and strategic dimensions
India cannot consider Afghanistan in isolation. China has moved rapidly to fill the vacuum. It has signed mining deals, expanded Belt and Road plans, and positioned itself as Kabul’s most important economic partner. Pakistan remains influential, though distracted by internal instability.
If India withdraws completely, will the space be occupied by others? Yes. But if India re-engages too quickly, will it appear to endorse a government that the world has refused to recognise? Again, yes. The challenge lies in balancing these two truths.
India’s limited engagement gives it a foothold in a region of strategic significance. Central Asian states prefer a multipolar presence. The United States is cautious about Afghanistan but remains attentive to India’s role. A measured economic interaction can preserve India’s influence without compromising its diplomatic alignment.
Policy and governance dimensions
India has three broad choices. The first is to expand trade incrementally through humanitarian and essential-goods channels. This preserves India’s presence without breaching sanctions. The second is to strengthen connectivity. Chabahar must move from a political slogan to a functioning logistics hub. Its importance grows as Pakistan constricts land access.
The third is to reform our own systems. Exporters need clear guidelines on what is permissible under sanctions. Inter-ministerial coordination must improve. Risk-assessment mechanisms must be strengthened, especially for firms operating in politically volatile regions. Is India prepared for this? The intent exists, but institutional capacity is uneven. Without internal reforms, any trade revival with Afghanistan will be slow and uncertain.
Sanctions, compliance, and risk management
The most demanding constraint is the sanctions framework. The United States, the European Union and multilateral institutions have placed wide-ranging restrictions on Afghan entities. Banks involved in Afghanistan-linked transactions face intrusive scrutiny. Firms dealing with sanctioned individuals risk secondary sanctions.
Can India navigate this environment? Yes, but only with discipline. Humanitarian exemptions cover food, medicines and essential goods. These can be the starting point. Non-banking payment channels, rupee-denominated settlements, or barter-style arrangements can reduce risk. Government-backed export guarantees may encourage cautious firms.
But compliance must be rigorous. Any transaction that touches a sanctioned entity will invite consequences. India must therefore maintain full transparency with global partners, especially Washington. The narrative must be clear: India is not legitimising the Taliban, it is stabilising the region and supporting the Afghan people.
Implications and recommendations
What should India do now? First, establish a Delhi–Kabul trade-corridor taskforce involving the Ministries of External Affairs, Commerce, Finance and security agencies. Fragmented policymaking will only create uncertainty. Second, prioritise Chabahar as the principal access route. It reduces reliance on Pakistan and strengthens India’s presence in the Indian Ocean region.
Third, focus on early-win sectors such as pharmaceuticals, food products, agricultural inputs and medical supplies. These meet humanitarian needs and are easier to justify under sanctions exemptions. Fourth, insist on stringent compliance protocols for every firm working in Afghanistan. The reputational and legal risks are too high for a casual approach. Fifth, maintain diplomatic clarity. India should reaffirm that its engagement is with the Afghan people, not the Taliban regime. This distinction is essential.
The pitfalls are obvious. Afghanistan’s internal volatility, regional rivalries, and banking constraints can undo gains quickly. But disengagement carries its own risks, including ceding space to other powers.
India’s Afghanistan trade strategy can indeed be a game-changer—if guided by clarity, discipline and foresight. A policy shaped by constitutional values, economic logic and geopolitical realism will serve India better than either haste or hesitation.