Country of origin e-commerce rules: More than a decade after online marketplaces transformed Indian retail, the government is finally tightening the rules that govern them. Despite repeated appeals from small vendors and traditional retailers, e-commerce has operated in a regulatory grey zone. This may soon change. The ministry of consumer affairs has proposed amendments to the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 that would require every digital marketplace to provide searchable and sortable ‘country of origin’ filters for online listings. The move aligns with the government’s Atmanirbhar Bharat and Vocal for Local initiatives. It seeks to give domestic manufacturers greater visibility alongside imported goods — a long-standing demand of Indian producers who feel disadvantaged in the digital marketplace.
For e-commerce giants like Amazon and Flipkart, the proposed rule introduces significant technical and compliance challenges. Their search algorithms are optimised for price, reviews, delivery speed, and popularity. Integrating ‘country of origin’ as a filter or ranking factor could disrupt existing systems. Imported goods may lose visibility unless they compete on other parameters.
READ | India’s power grid bottleneck is stalling clean power
The government’s intent is clear — to apply the same consumer transparency standards that physical stores follow. The challenge lies in retrofitting massive catalogues with verified origin data and redesigning user interfaces so the filter is both accurate and accessible. For many platforms, this will mean investing in data verification and user-experience redesigns that go well beyond a simple software tweak.
Small sellers face a mixed bag
For small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), the regulation could be a double-edged sword. On one hand, it gives them marketing leverage by allowing them to highlight Made in India credentials amid growing pro-local sentiment. On the other, it brings additional compliance obligations — documentation, verification, and accurate tagging.
Some micro-traders may find the process cumbersome. The benefits will accrue mostly to those who already have reliable supply chains and can prove product origin. Still, the change could enhance consumer trust in domestic brands, a necessary step if India wants to nurture competitive, home-grown e-commerce champions.
E-commerce rules: Consumers and the global trade lens
The real question is whether consumers care. Despite government campaigns, many Indian shoppers continue to equate “foreign-made” with higher quality. The rule may help informed consumers make ethical or nationalistic choices, but its real-world impact will depend on awareness and usability.
The proposal also has international trade implications. Under World Trade Organisation (WTO) norms, origin marking must not create restrictive or distortive effects on global trade. If India’s rule reduces the visibility of imported goods, it could invite scrutiny under the “national treatment” principle. Policymakers must therefore ensure that transparency does not translate into discrimination in digital markets.
Beyond origin: The regulatory vacuum
The ‘country of origin’ clause is only a small patch in a much larger regulatory vacuum. India still lacks a dedicated e-commerce law. Current oversight rests on a loose network of rules under the Consumer Protection (E-commerce) Rules, 2020, the IT Act, and the Competition Act. Enforcement remains fragmented and often reactive.
A robust e-commerce framework must look beyond labelling. It should address algorithmic opacity, deep discounting, and the dominance of platform-owned logistics networks that blur the line between retailer and marketplace. It should also include clear data protection, grievance redressal, and MSME safeguards. Without these, the “country of origin” filter risks being symbolic — a cosmetic reform in a system that needs structural change.
India’s e-commerce market, projected to exceed $350 billion by 2030, is too important to be left in regulatory limbo. The new rule could become a useful stepping stone toward a more transparent and equitable digital marketplace. But its success depends on how well the government balances consumer awareness, platform accountability, and global trade obligations.
If designed carefully, this measure can strengthen both consumer sovereignty and domestic manufacturing. But if poorly implemented, it risks creating new compliance burdens without fixing the deeper flaws in India’s e-commerce governance.