In a sudden nationwide address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi urged citizens to conserve fuel, postpone gold purchases and favour domestic goods as global energy prices pressure India’s external account. He framed austerity as patriotism.
The concern is real. India’s import dependence leaves the rupee, inflation and the current account exposed to global shocks. The question is whether behavioural appeals can stabilise the external sector without hurting demand and growth. The draft supplied for editing makes this core argument and cites India’s oil and gold import dependence as the central policy problem.
READ | Gold prices are telling something central banks will not say aloud
India’s import dependence needs structural correction
India imports more than 85% of its crude oil requirements. Gold, too, is a large part of the import basket. According to GTRI, gold imports rose from $36.5 billion in 2022 to $58.9 billion in 2025.
The logic for reducing import dependence is clear. Imports expose India to global price swings, widen the current account deficit, weaken the rupee and complicate inflation management. Modi’s call for carpooling, public transport and work-from-home may help at the margin.
But the gains will be limited. Fuel consumption is not wholly discretionary. Industry, logistics and mobility run on energy. A sharp fall in fuel use may signal slower activity rather than higher efficiency. Past conservation campaigns have also worked only when backed by price signals, taxes, regulation or better public transport. Nudges alone cannot do the job.
The larger omission in such appeals is the institutional side of adjustment. External-sector stress is managed not only by households consuming less, but by the RBI’s exchange-rate management, the Centre’s tax and subsidy choices, DGFT’s import rules, customs enforcement, and the credibility of domestic alternatives. Fuel demand falls durably when public transport improves, freight shifts to rail, vehicles become more efficient and clean-energy capacity reduces oil intensity. Gold demand moderates when households trust financial savings as much as physical assets.
Without these policy channels, austerity becomes a slogan rather than a macroeconomic instrument. RBI and official statements show that forex reserves, intervention capacity and capital flows remain central to external-sector management, while DGFT rules govern import-export access through mechanisms such as the Importer-Exporter Code. NITI Aayog’s transport work also underlines the efficiency advantage of rail, and RBI’s gold monetisation framework shows that financial alternatives to household gold holdings already exist, though with limited reach.
READ | India’s fertiliser imports hit by Iran war’s quiet shock
Gold imports reflect culture and policy
Gold is different from oil. It is not an input for transport, power or industry. Economists treat most household gold purchases as discretionary consumption or savings demand. When imported gold demand rises, dollars leave the country without adding to productive capacity.
Yet gold is not an ordinary consumer good in India. It is tied to weddings, family savings and social security, particularly in rural households. Parents save for years to buy gold for marriages. A prime ministerial appeal is unlikely to change that behaviour during the wedding season. In periods of uncertainty, gold demand can even rise as households seek safety.
The rise in imports is also not just a matter of household choice. The India-UAE Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, which came into force in 2022, changed import incentives. Gold from the UAE receives a tariff advantage under a tariff-rate quota system. After the 2024 Budget cut India’s base import duty on gold from 15% to 6%, the effective duty on UAE-origin gold reportedly fell to about 5%.
GTRI has argued that imports routed through Dubai rose sharply, with the UAE’s share in India’s gold imports increasing from under 8% to 28% by 2025. If this assessment is correct, India is dealing with a trade policy loophole, not merely a consumer habit.
A serious gold import strategy would therefore examine rules of origin, tariff concessions and routing incentives. Asking households to defer purchases may be politically attractive. It is not a durable external-sector policy.
READ | LPG import dependence meets Hormuz disruption: Indian kitchens may feel the pinch
Vocal for local cannot be a crisis shortcut
The appeal to cut fuel use, foreign travel and gold purchases also has a demand-side cost. Private consumption accounts for nearly 60% of India’s GDP. A broad call to suppress consumption can hurt sectors already facing weak demand.
“Vocal for local” is not new. As a long-term industrial strategy, it has merit. India does need stronger domestic manufacturing, deeper supply chains and greater import substitution where it is economically viable. But domestic capacity is not created by exhortation. It requires competitiveness, infrastructure, technology, finance and reliable logistics.
A crisis appeal cannot substitute for industrial policy. Nor can it quickly reduce dependence on imported energy, electronics, fertilisers, machinery or critical inputs.
READ | Russian crude imports and India’s strategic autonomy
Fertiliser use needs reform, not exhortation
The call to reduce fertiliser use has a stronger policy basis. Fertiliser imports add to the import bill, and global prices have been volatile. Balanced nutrient use is fiscally sound and environmentally necessary.
But farmers respond to price signals, soil conditions, procurement incentives and risk. Lower chemical fertiliser dependence requires soil testing, extension services, better input pricing, crop diversification and credible alternatives. It cannot be achieved through moral pressure alone.
Patriotism is not macroeconomic policy
Modi’s address seeks collective responsibility during a period of external stress. That message may resonate politically. Its economic effect will depend on policy follow-through.
India’s import bill cannot be fixed by asking households to drive less, buy less gold and choose local products. The harder work lies elsewhere: scrutinising trade agreements, closing tariff loopholes, improving domestic production, managing energy demand, reforming fertiliser use and strengthening competitiveness.
Patriotic appeals can create a mood. They cannot correct structural dependence. India needs policy, not just persuasion.