India’s aviation sector was jolted on June 12 by one of its worst air disasters. Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787 Dreamliner en route to London, crashed just seconds after take-off from Ahmedabad, killing 241 passengers and crew on board. The final death toll stood at around 270, including those injured on the ground — a figure that has cast a long shadow over India’s booming aviation industry.
The crash of a modern aircraft like the Dreamliner — built for long-haul comfort and efficiency — has sent shockwaves through both the industry and a flying public accustomed to placing immense trust in national carriers. Air India, now operated by the Tata Group, has been aggressively expanding international routes, but this incident raises serious questions about fleet readiness, maintenance discipline, and regulatory oversight.
READ | Why India’s poverty decline may not be what it seems
Safety oversight and warning signs
In the immediate aftermath, India’s aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), conducted a safety audit of Air India’s 787 fleet. While it claimed there were no major safety issues, the regulator did flag systemic delays in maintenance and coordination lapses between engineering, operations, and ground handling teams.
This is not the first warning sign. Days before the crash, 13 Dreamliner flights were grounded due to technical issues — all international routes, indicating deep-set operational fragilities. Pilots reportedly raised red flags, with one incident involving a pilot suffering a panic attack moments before take-off, reflecting heightened anxiety and operational stress within the cockpit.
The crash has also exposed critical human resource shortages. A March 2024 Parliamentary Standing Committee report flagged alarming understaffing at the DGCA, with a 53% vacancy rate that compromises the agency’s ability to enforce safety norms and inspect airline operations thoroughly. This chronic weakness in India’s aviation regulatory framework may have eroded a vital layer of institutional safety assurance.
An airline under strain
Since its takeover by Tata Sons in early 2022, Air India has undergone a rapid transformation — expanding routes, placing historic aircraft orders, and attempting to restore its tarnished legacy. However, the pace of new aircraft induction has been sluggish due to global supply chain disruptions.
The result is an overstretched operation where old aircraft — including many Dreamliners — must be kept flying longer than optimal. This increases pressure on in-house maintenance and repair teams, many of whom are now dealing with high workloads, limited spares, and time constraints. Customers have repeatedly flagged issues with air conditioning, electrical systems, and aging interiors — all signs of deferred maintenance.
Worryingly, India’s air passenger traffic is expected to double by 2030. A strong foundation in aircraft readiness, scheduling resilience, and crew availability must underpin this growth. At present, India appears ill-prepared.
Dreamliner’s troubled history
The spotlight is now firmly on Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner series — a model already notorious for manufacturing and design flaws. Flight AI171 was one of 36 Dreamliners in Air India’s fleet. Several of these were sourced from Boeing’s Charleston, South Carolina plant — a facility previously under intense scrutiny.
Whistleblower complaints have long dogged the Charleston plant. Cynthia Kitchens, a former quality manager, recently revealed that six Dreamliners with critical defects were delivered to Air India between 2012 and 2013. Allegations include defective fuselage components, rushed quality checks, and excessive reliance on outsourced design work. In April 2024, a former Boeing employee and whistleblower, John Barnett, was found dead days after testifying about Boeing’s quality practices, deepening public unease.
While Boeing has made some amends and continues to deliver aircraft globally, the number of incidents involving the 787 — including battery fires, engine icing, and seat mechanism failures — has severely dented its safety reputation. Investigations into Flight AI171 are expected to focus closely on these design and quality concerns.
Maintenance, fatigue, and risk
Maintenance is performed by DGCA-certified Aircraft Maintenance Engineers (AMEs), and airlines like Air India use both in-house and third-party providers. However, the effectiveness of these teams hinges on proactive scheduling, spare availability, and managerial vigilance.
Early reports from the crash site suggest possible anomalies with the landing gear and flaps — critical components during take-off. If confirmed, this could point to pre-flight inspection gaps or in-flight system malfunctions. Additionally, experts are reviewing Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) data for signs of deferred maintenance or unresolved faults.
Pilot fatigue is another silent risk. A shortage of trained pilots, long-duty hours, and frequent tail swaps — switching pilots between aircraft at short notice — have eroded operational safety margins. Studies across global aviation suggest fatigue impairs decision-making and reaction time, particularly during high-stress phases like take-off and landing.
India’s regulatory reckoning
The DGCA, while responsive in the aftermath of incidents, continues to operate with limited bandwidth. Its understaffing issue, combined with inadequate funding relative to the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, was called out by Parliament earlier this year. Regulatory reform must move beyond post-crisis audits and into real-time oversight, digital fleet tracking, and predictive maintenance analytics.
The preliminary crash investigation report, expected within 30 days, will examine pilot training logs, aircraft logs, CCTV footage, and air traffic control communication. A final report, as per ICAO protocols, is due within 12 months.
Lessons for a sky-bound India
Crash investigations have historically driven breakthroughs in aviation safety — from improved cockpit protocols to better design standards. India must embrace this tragedy not as an isolated failure but as a systemic wake-up call.
The country’s emergence as the world’s third-largest aviation market brings new responsibilities. Airlines must proactively retire aging aircraft and resist the temptation to cut costs on maintenance. The regulator must modernise, staff up, and adopt AI-based predictive systems to flag early signs of failure. And the government must hold both manufacturers and airlines accountable — with special scrutiny of Boeing’s global supply chain.
Global aviation operates on trust. When a passenger boards a flight, they trust not just the airline, but an entire ecosystem of regulators, engineers, and global manufacturers. India must now prove that this trust is not misplaced.