Toxic foam at Marina Beach raises concerns: The frothing waves that turned Chennai’s iconic Marina Beach into a sheet of toxic foam last week are not a seasonal oddity — they are a distress signal from India’s coastal ecosystems. What appeared as a fleeting environmental spectacle is, in fact, the visible symptom of a deeper urban malaise: collapsing drainage systems, choked canal-sea linkages, and a municipal governance model that lags behind the pace of urbanisation.
The Adyar estuary, where the toxic foam first appeared, is a natural drainage sink connecting the city’s waterways to the Bay of Bengal. But years of encroachment, untreated sewage inflow, and haphazard stormwater management have converted this ecological lifeline into a conduit for pollution. Experts from the National Centre for Coastal Research (NCCR) have repeatedly warned that surfactants from detergents, untreated industrial waste, and high concentrations of phosphates create chemical reactions that produce foam when agitated by rainfall and tidal movement.
Chennai is not alone. From Mumbai’s Juhu Beach to Bengaluru’s Bellandur Lake, India’s water bodies periodically erupt in toxic froth — a sign that the urban environment is literally bubbling over with neglect.
READ I Delhi air pollution crisis points to governance failure
Weak coastal management and toxic foam at Marina Beach
The toxic foam at Marina Beach lays bare how India’s urban drainage infrastructure remains woefully inadequate. The Comptroller and Auditor General’s 2023 report on Tamil Nadu’s urban local bodies found that less than 60% of Chennai’s sewage is treated before being released into waterways. Much of the rest flows untreated into the Cooum and Adyar rivers, which then empty directly into the sea.
Even as the state boasts of spending over ₹5,000 crore on stormwater drains and flood-prevention systems, these projects have often been fragmented, reactive, and poorly integrated with coastal zone management plans. The Chennai Corporation’s Smart City projects, for instance, built new drains without ensuring their connectivity to existing canals, creating isolated pockets of flow. When monsoon rains arrive, these drains overflow into streets and rivers — carrying industrial waste, sewage, and detergent residues with them.
What makes this particularly concerning is that these failures undermine the National Coastal Mission and Swachh Bharat Urban 2.0, both of which emphasise integrated water management. Yet, as the Marina incident shows, India’s urban planning still treats water as a nuisance to be drained, not as a resource to be managed sustainably.
When canals become sewers
The original design of Chennai’s canal system — the Buckingham Canal, Otteri Nullah, and Cooum and Adyar rivers — was intended to act as a natural buffer against floods and facilitate sediment exchange with the sea. But in recent decades, unplanned construction and waste dumping have narrowed these arteries. A 2022 study by Anna University found that canal widths have shrunk by nearly 40% in some stretches, drastically reducing discharge capacity.
This degradation has profound ecological consequences. Blocked outfalls mean that tidal flushing, which once kept the estuaries oxygen-rich, now fails to occur effectively. This accelerates eutrophication — the over-enrichment of water bodies with nutrients — which leads to algal blooms, fish deaths, and the formation of persistent foam.
The situation also threatens India’s coastal sustainability goals, particularly those outlined in the Blue Economy Policy Framework (2021) that seeks to balance maritime growth with ecological conservation. When estuaries become open sewers, they not only harm local biodiversity but also erode the very coastal resilience needed to withstand cyclones and sea-level rise.
Governance without integration
At the heart of this crisis is fragmented governance. The Chennai Corporation oversees stormwater drainage, the Public Works Department manages rivers, and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board regulates effluents — yet none of these bodies operate within a unified framework. The result is a bureaucratic patchwork where accountability is diffuse and outcomes are diluted.
The NITI Aayog’s Composite Water Management Index (2023) ranked Tamil Nadu among states needing urgent improvement in urban water governance. One of the key findings was the lack of “institutional convergence” between urban development and environmental protection agencies. The Marina foam incident exemplifies this failure — even as one department builds drains, another neglects wastewater treatment, and yet another struggles to enforce discharge norms.
Chennai’s resilience roadmap under the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group recognises the need for a “water-sensitive city model.” But unless governance aligns horizontally across departments and vertically from state to local levels, such frameworks will remain on paper.
Economic and health costs of ecological neglect
The toxic foam on Marina Beach may appear benign, but it conceals toxic consequences. According to the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), such foam contains heavy metals, phosphates, and pathogens that can cause skin irritation, respiratory distress, and long-term health risks for people living nearby.
There is also an economic dimension. Coastal tourism in Chennai contributes significantly to local livelihoods, while fishing supports nearly 1.5 lakh families across Tamil Nadu. Contaminated shorelines, fish mortality, and the stench of untreated sewage directly hit these incomes. The World Bank’s India Country Environmental Analysis (2023) estimated that poor water quality and inadequate sanitation cost the Indian economy nearly 2.6% of GDP annually through health and productivity losses.
In that context, the toxic foam at Marina Beach is not just an environmental episode — it is a fiscal liability. Every cubic metre of untreated sewage that enters the ocean adds to future costs in healthcare, tourism losses, and disaster vulnerability.
Building resilient coastal cities
The toxic foam at Marina Beach is a reminder that India’s coastal sustainability cannot be achieved through piecemeal interventions or ad-hoc clean-up drives. What Chennai — and other coastal cities — need is a coastal urban resilience plan that integrates four critical dimensions:
First, wastewater governance must be prioritised. Every stormwater drain must be linked to a functional sewage treatment network, monitored through real-time data dashboards as mandated under the National Mission for Clean Ganga (Namami Gange 2.0). Second, urban planning must restore canal-sea linkages. Rehabilitating the Adyar and Cooum river mouths, dredging silted canals, and relocating encroachments are prerequisites to restoring tidal flow and preventing stagnation.
Third, citizen monitoring must be institutionalised. Community-led water quality testing and participatory budgeting, as piloted in Kerala’s Haritha Karma Sena, can bring accountability closer to the ground. Finally, governance must converge. A single coastal management authority, empowered to coordinate between municipal corporations, pollution boards, and disaster agencies, would ensure that environmental stewardship becomes an integral part of urban administration — not an afterthought.
If the toxic foam at Marina Beach is today’s spectacle, tomorrow’s disaster may come as floods, disease, or declining fisheries. The choice before policymakers is simple: treat this as a passing embarrassment or as a wake-up call to redesign India’s coastal governance for a sustainable urban future.