Missing air quality data: Every Diwali, New Delhi becomes a microcosm of India’s air pollution crisis. This year, the debate took a darker turn when air-quality data itself disappeared during the festival’s most toxic hours. According to the Times of India, real-time readings from Delhi’s monitoring network mysteriously stopped between 10 p.m. and 3 a.m. on Diwali night. What vanished was not only 163 hours of pollution data — five times more than last year — but also a measure of public trust in India’s environmental governance. The question that now looms is simple: how serious is the government about clean air? When transparency fails, credibility collapses.
By 1 a.m. on Diwali, only 19 of Delhi’s 39 monitoring stations were working; by 3 a.m., the number dropped to 12. The system revived only after dawn, once the smog had thinned. Such a coincidence strains belief. The Delhi Chief Minister’s office reportedly placed an emergency order for ₹5.5 lakh worth of air purifiers that night — proof that authorities knew exactly how hazardous the air had become. To dismiss the outage as a technical glitch would be naive. It exposes how fragile India’s environmental monitoring framework remains. A government that claims success in cleaning Delhi’s air cannot afford such lapses without eroding its narrative.
READ I How stablecoins threaten India’s monetary sovereignty
Data integrity and policy credibility
Governance begins with credible data. The National Clean Air Programme (NCAP), launched in 2019, seeks to cut PM2.5 and PM10 levels by 40 per cent in 131 cities by 2026. Yet the plan rests on accurate, continuous measurements. When the world’s most polluted capital can “go dark” on its worst pollution night, every clean-air claim becomes questionable.
India’s Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has faced criticism before for unexplained gaps in its datasets. Independent analysts at Dataful have shown repeated discontinuities — often during politically sensitive periods. If Delhi’s sophisticated network can fail so easily, smaller cities stand little chance of maintaining reliable air quality data.
Missing air quality data, missing accountability
The impact of air quality date data disappearance extends beyond numbers. Citizens cannot make informed health choices; researchers lose continuity; and journalists cannot hold governments to account. Transparency is the first casualty, accountability the next.
Comparisons are instructive. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains open, timestamped data portals that allow any citizen to track air-quality metrics in real time. Delhi should aspire to similar openness — especially as India defends its development-first stance on global climate platforms. But the political reflex in India is to look away, not confront.
Institutional gaps and oversight failure
The episode also exposes weak institutional oversight. Both the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) operate the city’s air-quality stations, but neither undergoes independent audit. The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has repeatedly flagged weak data validation and maintenance in environmental monitoring.
Establishing a statutory data-integrity audit mechanism—similar to how SEBI monitors financial disclosures—could restore credibility. Without such checks, environmental data remains vulnerable to both neglect and manipulation.
The hidden economic and health cost
The cost of polluted air is not just human—it is economic. According to the World Bank, air pollution costs India nearly 1.4% of its GDP every year through lost productivity and healthcare expenditure. The Lancet Planetary Health estimates over 1.6 million premature deaths in India in 2019 due to toxic air. In Delhi alone, residents lose an estimated 11 years of life expectancy. These figures highlight that clean air is not merely an environmental goal but a fiscal and public-health imperative.
When data goes missing, it obscures the true scale of this crisis and delays targeted interventions. The longer policymakers deny transparency, the greater the long-term social and economic damage.
Citizen data rights and digital transparency
The blackout of air quality data also challenges citizens’ right to information in a digital democracy. If environmental data can vanish without explanation, it undermines Digital India’s promise of open governance. Pollution levels should be treated as public data, accessible and immutable.
Technologies such as blockchain-based timestamping could make air-quality logs tamper-proof and verifiable. More importantly, a Public Environmental Data Charter—mandating open, real-time data access for all Indian cities—can safeguard against future manipulation. The right to know what one breathes is as vital as the right to breathe itself.
Pattern in missing air quality data
This is not the first air quality data blackout. Previous gaps in pollution readings coincided with major events—from international summits to election seasons. Each time, authorities offered technical excuses; none held up under scrutiny. The pattern reveals a deeper discomfort with transparency.
Meanwhile, every winter, Delhi’s air turns toxic and attention drifts to symbolic bans—on crackers, stubble burning, or construction—while structural reforms remain stalled. The government reacts to outrage, not to evidence.
The human cost of air pollution
According to the Air Quality Life Index by the University of Chicago’s Energy Policy Institute, air pollution shortens the average Indian’s life by more than five years—and by over 11 years for Delhi residents. India hosts 13 of the 20 most polluted cities globally. Without trustworthy data, even these alarming figures risk underestimation. Clean air is not a luxury; it is a constitutional right under Article 21—the right to life. That right loses meaning when environmental data can be manipulated or erased.
Global experience shows that cleaner air is possible when governments combine transparency with enforcement. Beijing reduced PM2.5 levels by more than 40% between 2013 and 2020 through real-time data disclosure and strict industrial controls. London’s Ultra-Low Emission Zone similarly cut nitrogen dioxide levels by a quarter within two years. Delhi can draw from these lessons—where public accountability was the first step toward clean air.
India’s environmental governance will earn credibility only when air quality data integrity becomes non-negotiable. Real-time backups, open access, and independent audits must be mandated for all monitoring networks. What vanished this Diwali was not merely information, but faith in public institutions. To restore that trust, India must treat air quality data as a public good, not a political inconvenience.