What rising gold loans tell about household finances: Loans against gold are growing in India, raising concerns over the financial health of households. According to Piramal Finance, a NBFC dealing in the goal loan market, 15-23% of gross gold loan disbursements across the industry in 2025-26 went to borrowers who were more than 90 days overdue on at least one other outstanding loan. The point is not that households are using gold jewellery to access credit but that some borrowers may be pledging gold to repay existing loans rather than meet productive expenses or generate income. When families start mortgaging their savings to keep up with existing debt, it may signal that their incomes and financial buffers are under pressure.
The gold loans disbursed during FY2025-26 were estimated at ₹4.7 trillion. This does not mean that every such loan was used to repay old debt. These may also have been taken by families which have regular earnings but whose savings may be insufficient to absorb a major financial shock.
READ | World gold prices have a higher floor despite Fed rate hikes
When wealth cannot pay the bills
Even for families that may appear financially stable from outside, one prolonged illness or other emergency means that its monthly cash flow can deteriorate quickly. Jewellery can then provide immediate liquidity as selling a property often comes with delays and obtaining an unsecured personal loan is not a sound choice.
If gold is used to finance a temporary setback and for recovery, it is not problematic. The problem begins when the setback is not temporary. A family that pledges jewellery to clear overdue credit card dues or personal loan installments means the family has not improved its finances and is plunging further into debt. It has exchanged one liability for another, while putting an asset at risk.
In essence, gold assets can solve immediate crisis and liquidity problems but not perpetual expenses. For middle-class households, financial stability does not simply mean how much wealth a family owns. It also depends on whether its income can cover housing costs, education, healthcare, transport, insurance and debt repayments without repeatedly drawing on accumulated assets.
The scale of gold-backed lending makes the concern of financial stability versus rising credit need difficult to dismiss. Outstanding gold loans from banks rose 83% year-on-year to approximately ₹5.6 trillion as of August 31, 2026. NBFC gold loans increased 69% to around ₹3.6 trillion. These figures do not indicate a crisis. Rising gold prices can increase the value of eligible collateral, while formal lending can replace informal borrowing at opaque or exploitative rates. Gold loans can also support households facing temporary cash shortages. Their growth does not automatically mean financial distress.
But the speed of expansion warrants scrutiny. Where are households using the credit and what is the quality of repayment capacity. The Reserve Bank of India’s June 2026 Financial Stability Report placed household debt at 47.8% of GDP at the end of the third quarter of FY26, driven partly by housing, vehicle and gold loans. At the same time, the proportion of borrowers with stronger repayment capacity improved to 72% in FY26 from 69.4% in FY25. The important point is that while aggregate indicators show households are stable to repay, averages may hide vulnerable households.
Credit is often seen as a way to improve financial well being by investing in productive work. However, that may not be true always. A household can continue spending, meeting its immediate obligations and maintaining its lifestyle even as its financial position weakens. Borrowing allows consumption to continue today but repayment will claim a portion of tomorrow’s income. If a growing share of borrowing is used to refinance existing debt rather than generate income or build assets, credit growth may sustain the appearance of demand without creating an equivalent improvement in household finances.
Official data shows that household financial conditions are not deteriorating for all. The conclusion is that rapid credit growth is there with pockets of serious household vulnerability.
For lenders, gold loan is secure as if a borrower defaults, the lender may recover its dues by selling the pledged gold. This protects the lender’s balance sheet more than it protects the borrower’s financial future. Suresh Ganapathy, Managing Director and Head of Research in India, Macquarie Capital said that the borrower’s ability to pay does not improve merely because gold has been pledged. A loan secured by jewellery can still be unaffordable. If several lenders assess the same borrower, each may see valuable collateral without fully appreciating the household’s total repayment burden.
The Reserve Bank’s 2025 lending against gold and silver framework recognised the importance of borrower assessment. The revised directions require detailed credit assessment, including repayment capacity, for loans above specified thresholds while also prescribing safeguards around collateral valuation, lending limits and auctions. The rules aim to make short-term, gold-backed borrowing more accessible while limiting lending risks.
Going ahead, India needs to regulate formal credit. A loan that helps a small trader purchase inventory can generate income but one that finances another loan’s overdue installment may simply defer a default. Both appear as credit disbursed, but their economic consequences are very different.
Lenders should monitor borrowers’ overall obligations, identify repeated refinancing and intervene before accounts deteriorate further. Borrowers must also be aware of information about interest, fees, maturity dates and the circumstances in which pledged jewellery may be auctioned. Policymakers must also look beyond enhancing credit. They should as why some families need to mortgage their accumulated wealth to keep up with existing payments.
Gold has long been a safety net for households. If it becomes the last line of defence against recurring debt, the warning is not that families have run out of assets, it is that their assets may be doing the work their incomes and financial buffers can no longer do.