Site icon Policy Circle

Luxury market growth reveals limits of headline consumption

Luxury market

India’s luxury market is expanding, but premium car sales reveal little about the financial security and spending power of ordinary households.

Luxury market growth reveals limits of headline consumption: India’s households do not experience rising prosperity in the same way. Some buyers are willing to pay lakhs of rupees to have a luxury car painted in a particular shade. Others must weigh the cost of shampoo, biscuits or bread against the rest of the household budget. The contrast is visible in the market for premium goods, where demand for expensive, personalised products is growing even as the spending power of many households remains constrained.

Luxury consumption is often taken as evidence of economic confidence. Crore-priced cars, designer watches and customised interiors suggest that a section of Indians has accumulated enough wealth to spend freely on things they do not need. Yet a booming market at the top of the income distribution cannot, on its own, establish that purchasing power is rising across the economy. The more important question is how far the capacity to spend is spreading beyond affluent households.

READ | The new age of consumption redefining luxury and necessity

Personalisation commands a premium

India’s luxury-car market illustrates the willingness of wealthy consumers to pay for exclusivity. Jaguar Land Rover India has reported that demand for vehicle personalisation has more than doubled in two years. Some Range Rover customers are prepared to spend as much as ₹1 crore above the vehicle’s base price to obtain a car built to their specifications.

The prices attached to limited editions offer another indication of this appetite. The Range Rover SV Ranthambore Edition was priced at ₹4.98 crore, with all 12 units reportedly sold within a week. Its successor in this series, the SV Masara Edition, was priced at ₹4.99 crore and also sold out at launch. An Audi India customer reportedly paid ₹12.29 lakh for a custom Java Green paint finish on an RS Q8, while other buyers have spent tens of lakhs of rupees on additional equipment.

These purchases are about more than the utility of a car. Buyers are paying for rarity and the ability to distinguish their possessions from standard models. Once the conventional version no longer satisfies a customer, personalisation allows the manufacturer to charge for an individual specification as well as the underlying product.

For carmakers, this can raise revenue per vehicle without requiring a corresponding increase in unit sales. Personalisation also gives manufacturers a way to serve customers who are less sensitive to price than the mass market. The strategy is particularly attractive in a segment where sales volumes are limited but each transaction can generate substantial revenue.

The same commercial logic extends to luxury goods and services. Premium brands offer limited editions, bespoke products and exclusive customer experiences to attract buyers who can afford to pay for individuality. Euromonitor’s September 2025 assessment of India’s luxury-goods market identifies rising disposable incomes, an expanding aspirational middle class and a growing population of high-net-worth individuals as important drivers of demand. The report also points to the growing importance of personalisation in luxury consumption.

The expansion of this market is evidence that India has a sizeable and growing pool of consumers with substantial discretionary spending power. It does not tell us how representative those consumers are of the wider population.

READ | Beyond opulence: Luxury industry embracing sustainable practices

Household budgets tell a different story

The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation’s Household Consumption Expenditure Survey for 2023-24 provides a useful counterpoint. Average monthly per capita consumption expenditure was ₹4,122 in rural India and ₹6,996 in urban India, excluding the imputed value of goods received free through government welfare schemes. Among the top 5% of consumers ranked by expenditure, the corresponding averages were ₹10,137 in rural areas and ₹20,310 in urban areas.

These figures cannot be compared directly with the expenditure of luxury-car buyers. The survey measures household consumption across a broad range of goods and services, while the prices of bespoke vehicles reflect spending by a very small, affluent segment. The figures nevertheless illustrate the distance between ordinary household budgets and the purchasing power required to participate in the market for ultra-luxury goods. A single optional feature on a premium car can cost more than an average rural household spends on consumption in several months.

The survey also cautions against treating the contrast as a simple division between two entirely separate Indias. Consumption expenditure increased in both rural and urban areas in 2023-24. Average monthly per capita expenditure rose by about 9% in nominal terms in rural India and 8% in urban India compared with the previous year. Rural consumption is growing, and households do move up the spending ladder as their incomes and circumstances improve. But an increase in average expenditure does not establish that every household has gained the same financial room to spend.

The composition of household budgets helps explain the difference. For families with limited disposable income, food, housing, education, healthcare and transport claim much of what they earn. A rise in the price of essential goods or an interruption to earnings can force them to postpone purchases or draw on savings. Wealthier households have greater scope to absorb such shocks and continue spending on discretionary goods.

This difference in financial security is important when interpreting signs of a consumer recovery. Strong sales of premium cars may reflect robust demand among affluent buyers even when demand for everyday goods is weaker among households with less room in their budgets. Neither market alone provides a complete picture of consumption across India.

READ | In India, DINK is now a rational urban household choice

Luxury spending is not a measure of shared prosperity

A growing luxury market has economic benefits. It supports jobs in dealerships, hospitality, retail and specialised services. It can encourage investment in showrooms, after-sales support and customer service. Businesses serving affluent consumers also create demand for skilled workers and suppliers. The rise of entrepreneurs, professionals and business-owning families has created a market that international brands have reason to take seriously.

As incomes increase, consumer preferences also change. Buyers may become willing to pay more for quality, design, convenience and status after their basic needs are met. There is nothing inherently unproductive about that shift, and spending on premium goods should not be treated as evidence of economic weakness simply because the products are expensive.

The limitation lies in what luxury sales can tell us about the wider economy. They do not reveal whether employment is becoming more secure, whether wage growth is keeping pace with household expenses or whether families are building financial reserves. Nor do they show whether purchases are funded by current earnings, accumulated wealth, borrowing or gains in asset values. Each has different implications for the durability of consumption.

A small group of wealthy consumers can sustain a lucrative market even if purchasing power among the wider population grows slowly. That is why rising sales at the top end of the market need to be read alongside indicators of mass consumption, real wages, employment and household finances. Luxury demand may be strong while other parts of the consumer economy face pressure; the two developments are not mutually exclusive.

The next phase of India’s luxury market will depend partly on whether the number of affluent consumers continues to grow. Euromonitor expects the expansion of wealthy and aspirational consumers to support luxury-goods sales over the coming years. But the broader economic test is whether more households acquire the financial security to spend beyond their immediate needs.

Private consumption is a major component of India’s economic activity. When household incomes rise broadly, demand can reach businesses across price categories and support further employment. Spending concentrated among the wealthy can sustain profitable industries, but its benefits do not automatically extend to the rest of the economy. A market in which customers pay a premium to make their cars unique is a striking sign of private wealth. The stronger measure of prosperity is how many households can afford discretionary spending without putting essential expenses or financial security at risk.

READ | GST 3.0 should be about stability, not another rate reset

Exit mobile version